香港社會服務聯會
長者
 
回長者主目錄 | 聯絡我們 |資源庫| English |

簡介

長者長期照顧服務系統資源角

長期長期照顧系統研討會


與我們聯絡

 

 


長者長期系統服務系統資源角

(只供英文版,不便之處敬請原謜!)

TABLE OF CONTENT

Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Basic Concept of Long Term Care System
Chapter 3 Infrastructure of Long Term Care System
Chapter 4 Long Term Care System for Older Persons in Japan
Chapter 5 Long Term Care System for Older Persons in Germany
Chapter 6 Long Term Care System for Older Persons in Netherlands
Chapter 7 Some Thoughts for Hong Kong

 



CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

In Hong Kong, the trend of ageing is accelerating when the baby boomers enter into their old age. In 2001, there were 1,004,300 people who are 60 years or above, constituting 14.9% of the total population (1) . It is expected to rise to 1,936.000 in 2021(22.9%)and 2,341,100 in 2029 (25.9%) (2). The average life span in 1999 was 77.2 for male and 82.4 for female and it is expected to rise to 79.4 for male and 84.6 for female in 2029. The growing number of old-old is conspicuous. In 2001, there were 292,700 people who are 75 years old or above, accounting for 29.1% (3) of the aged population . There will be a drastic increase of this age group to 368,400in 2006 and 427,400 in 2011.

With the increasing longevity, people are more likely to suffer from different degrees of frailty and thus require different degree of Long-term care service. In 2001, there are nearly 291,247 people, making up 3% of population aged 60 or over cannot perform 1 or above ADL functions. Over 40% of the aged population suffered from more than one chronic disease (4). This percentage tends to increase with the growing number of "old-olds" in the future years.

In 2000, there are over 25% of the people living alone, living with their old-aged spouses or with other unrelated persons. They are unlikely to receive adequate care and support from their relatives. As highlighted in the Deloittee Study (5), the next general of elderly would prefer to live apart from their children. It is thus anticipated to have a great need for formal elderly care and the provision of a well organized comprehensive Long Term Care system is urgently called for.

In view of this, the Resource Group on Long Term Care System under The Specialized Committee on Elderly is exploring the future development of the Long Term Care System in Hong Kong. This resource corner provides information for the stimulation of thinking on the development of a Long Term Care System suitable for the local context.


(1) Census and Statistics Homepage(October,2000)
(2) Census and Statistics (2001)
(3) Census and Statistics Homepage(October, 2001)
(4) Special Topics Report No27 (2000)
(5) Deloittee and Touche Consulting Group(1997) The Study of the Needs of Elderly People in Hong Kong for Residential Care and Community Support Service,commissioned by the HK Government



返回頁首


CHAPTER 2 BASIC CONCEPT OF LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM

A) What is Long Term Care?

There are different definitions of the concept "Long Term Care":

  • Kane,1998 (6)
    Long-term care is defined as assistance given over a sustained period of time to people who are experiencing long term inabilities or difficulties in functioning because of a disability. Long-term care services are those services needed to compensate for the individual's functional impairments or those services designed to restore or improve functional abilities.

  • Evashwick,2001 (7)
    A wide range of health and health-related support services provided on an informal or formal basis to people who have functional disabilities over an extended period of time with the goal of maximizing their dependence.

In short, "Long-term care" is a client-centered service system with a spectrum of services organized in an integrated manner. The aim of Long-term care is to maintain elders in the maximum level of independency and capacity.

B) Characteristics of an ideal continuum of Long Term Care (Evashwick,2001):

  • Streamlines client flow and improves access for clients to the services they need when they need them;

  • Matches resources to the client's condition, avoiding duplication of services and use of inappropriate services;

  • Monitors the elder's condition and modifies services as needs change;

  • Coordinates the care of multiple disciplines in a range of settings;

  • Maintains a comprehensive record across settings;

  • Negotiates a comprehensive and rational financing.


(6) Kane RL, Kane RA,&Ladd RC(1998) The Heart of Long Term Care New York: Oxford Press
(7) Evashwick CJ (2001) The Continuum of Long-Term Care US: Delmar Thomson Learning



返回頁首



CHATPER 3 INFRASTRUCTURE of LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM (By Resource Group on Long Term Care System)

 

返回頁首



CHAPTER 4
LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM FOR OLDER PERSONS IN JAPAN

A) Long Term Care Needs in Japan

  • Aging population in Japan
    The ratio of those aged 65 or above is anticipated to increase from 17.2% in 2000 to 27.4% in 2025. Japan enjoys the greatest longevity in the world. The Life expectancy at birth is 83.5 for women and 77.02 for men. The number of those who are bedridden and dementia is expected to increase from 2.8 million in 2000 to 5.2 million in 2025, i.e. accounting for about 16% of those aged 65 or above elderly (8).

    (8) Source: information from the Japan Kaigo Research (www.kaigo.gv.jp)


  • Weakening of family care
    With the increasing number of nuclear family, the percentage of household where elderly are living with their off-springs are decreasing. The percentage of older persons aged 60 or above living with their children was decreasing from 52.8% in 1995 to 49.4% in 1998. The capacity of the family to care declines. It is common for the elderly in need of care to be over 80 years old and their caregivers are also in their old age, therefore the caregivers are difficult to provide adequate care.

  • Financial Burden on Medical Sector
    With better medical treatment and advanced technology, older persons with chronic illness live longer and they require more long term care service. As the medial expenses are covered by the medical care insurance, many older persons in need of long term care tend to stay in hospital for a long time. This poses great financial pressure on the medical system. Since hospitals mainly provide medical (acute) treatment, they did not have sufficient facilities and equipment to provide adequate care to the elderly in need of long term care service.

B) An Overview on the Development of Long Term Care System

The National government promulgated the "Ten-year Gold Plan for the Development of Health and Welfare Service for the Elderly in 1990 and The New Golden Plan in 1994. The pace of the development of various welfare services for the elderly accelerated to meet the increasing long term care needs.

To ensure a continuous provision of the long term care services, the Public Long Term Care Insurance has been implemented in 2000. It covers both community care and institutional care service for people aged 65 or over and those aged 40 or over with long term care need because of age related diseases. The burden of long term care expenses has been shared by the individual, the government and the society.

With the implementation of Long Term Care Insurance, a standardized assessment mechanism and case management system have been introduced simultaneously.

C) Basic Principle of the Long Term Care System

  • Respect for the choice of the older persons
    Older persons are entitled to utilize home care service and facility services in accordance with their needs and desires. They can access to the long term care services without being assessed on their financial situation

  • Integration of the welfare system and the health service system
    There is better integration between medical and welfare services as older persons can use both medical and long term care services within one LTC services delivery system.

  • Private-sector to provide elderly services
    Both public and private sectors are encourage to provide services for older persons while in the past, mainly public and NGO provided service.

  • Case management system
    A case management system has been introduced to ensure a better care planning and arrangement according to client's needs.


    D) Eligibility of Using Long Term Care Service

    Type I : 65 or above

    Type II : 40 or above with long term care needs because of age related
    diseases. The 15 age related diseases are as follows:

    1. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    2. Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
    3. Osteoporosis causing fracture
    4. Shy-Drager syndrome
    5. Dementia of those past middle age
    6. Spino-cerebellar degeneration
    7. Spinal canal stenosis
    8. Premature senility
    9. Diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy
    10. Cerebrovascular disease
    11. Parkinson's disease
    12. Occlusive arteriosclerosis
    13. Rheumatoid arthritis
    14. Chronic obstructive lung disease
    15. Osteoarthritis causing major deformation to both of the knee-joint or hip-joints

Assessment Procedure
The above two types of applicant can apply to the municipal office for the assessment of care needs. A care manager will be assigned to assess the applicant's condition with the standardized assessment tool. The older person's mobility, cognitive ability, functional ability, special nursing care needs and behavioural problems will be assessed.

Then the local assessment committee, which is composed of five specialists from health, medical and welfare sector, will determine the care level of the applicant with reference to the assessment result provided by the care manager and the doctor's recommendation.

The applicants will be classified into one of the six categories (Care level 1 to 6) according to their nursing care needs.

  • Applicants will be re-assessed in every six months or when the recipient's physical or mental conditions are changed.


    E) Service Delivery System


    When the Long Term Care Need Certificate is issued, the care plan would be developed either by the applicant or by a care-manager. The care plan should be based on the care level of the applicant. The service charge of the case management is covered by the Long Term Care insurance as well.

    Who can be a care manager?
  • Professionals (doctors, nurses, social workers, PTs etc.) with 5 years experience or non-professional(home helper) with 10 years experience

  • Passed a written qualification examination and 32 hours intensive and
    practical training



F) Long Term Care Service Content


Community care service

Home help Service A home helper visits the home to provide nursing care and other assistance
Visiting bath Service A vehicle with portable bath is brought to the home. Bathing assistance and other care is provided
Home Visit Nursing Service A registered nurse or public health nurse visits the home to provide nursing assistance
Home Visit Rehabilitation Service A Physiotherapy Therapy or other medical practitioner conducts rehabilitation therapy at the older person's home
Home Visit Medical advice Treatment-based medical advice by a doctor or dentist who visits the home
Day Care Service General nursing care, social and recreational activities at a Home Service Centre or other facility
Rehabilitation Centre Service Nursing care and physical therapy at a medical facility
Short-stay Service(Nursing care) Short term admission to a special nursing home with support and physical therapy
Short-stay Service (Health care facility) Short term admission to a Health care facility to receive medical treatment and assistance in daily life (Such as nursing care and physical therapy) through nursing and health care management
Group Home Service for the Demented Nursing care for demented elderly living in a group home
Rental or purchase of Health care equipment Rental service provided in Home Support Centre
Financial assistance for home modification Financial support for small scale home repairs, such as installation of hand rails or removal of steps


Institutional Service

Special Nursing Home Provide service to the older persons who have required continuous nursing care and those their independent living is difficult
Health Care Facilities Provide service to the older persons who has been stabilized from an illness and medical and nursing care, especially rehabilitation service is required
Long Term Care Geriatric Hospital Provide service to the older persons who required ling term medical treatment



G) Financing - Long Term Care Insurance

The long term care financing in Japan is classified as social insurance. It is financed by taxes, private contribution and co-payment.

All citizens aged 40 or above are required to participate in the Long Term Care Insurance Scheme. The local municipal government is the insurer.

Insured and Premium

  Type I Type II
Insured 65or above Between 40 and 64
Premium The amount of the premium depends on the services available in the municipalities and the income of the elderly.

There are five premium levels according to the elderly person's income. The average premium is US$26 a month.

For employees, the amount is dependent on the income. The payment is shared between the employee and the employer (1:1) (9)

For the self-employed, the premium is calculated according to their amount of income and assets. The national government pays the same amount of contribution as the insured person

(9) The premium paid by employee is about 0.5% of the income


Financing of the Long Term Care Insurance

50%
Public Funds

25% from National Government
12.5% from Prefectures
12.5% from Municipalities

17%
Premium from 65 or above

33%
Premium from 40 to 64



Beneficiary
*Exchange rate: Yen100:HK$6.5

Care Level In Home Service (HK$) LTC facilities (HK$) (10)
Support Required 4 000 ---
Care Level 1 10 777 13 084 - 23 263
Care Level 2 12 662 13 825 - 24 160
Care Level 3 17 387 14 547 - 25 057
Care Level 4 19 890 15 288 - 25 954
Care Level 5 23 289 16 009 - 26 851

(10) It depends on the type and scale of the facilities


Co-payment
The insured person is required to pay 10% of the service cost and the meals. For the low-income group, the amount of co-payment will be reduced or covered by the public assistance.



H) Area of concern raised within Japan

Relationship between service users, service providers and the government
With the introduction of the new insurance system, the relationship between the older person, the service operator and the government has been changed. Under the old system, the government commissioned the service providers and provided subsidies to them. The service operator is a contractor of the government to provide agreed services.

In the new system, the municipal government is the insurer, while the older person is the customer of the service operators. The older person (customer) is entitled to receive long term care service with the insurance benefits according to their care need. They can shop around different service operators. Besides, the service providers are no longer a contractor of the government Instead, they are the supplier of long term care services to the older persons.

In view of such changes, the service operators are having greater flexibility in the service provision to meet the service needs of the older persons. The older persons also have greater voice to negotiate for better service.

Integration between medical and welfare service
There is integration between the welfare and health insurance system for the older persons. Some services originally under the health insurance (Visiting nursing, health care facilities) were pooled into the Long Term Care Insurance in order to render a more comprehensive service. The applicants can receive both welfare and medical services under the same LTC system.

Case Management System
With the development of a case management system, the care of older persons can be better arranged and coordinated. However, since the case manager may be employee of a service operator of community care service, there would be conflict of interest in the process of service planning in favor of the service provider.

Interest of the Low Income Class
In the past, low-income recipients can use the welfare service at no cost. Under the new insurance system, they are required to pay for the premium ( on a sliding scale) and also the 10% co-payment, it may strain the financial situation of the low income family.

Responsibility of care for Older Persons
Prior to the implementation of Long Term Care Insurance, all elderly welfare services were funded from the taxes under the Welfare Law for the Elderly (1963). The service was mainly for poor people as the eligibility of the service was based on the income of the older persons and their family. Therefore, for the middle-income group, the family bears all the care responsibility of their seniors. With the implementation of Long Term Care insurance, the middle-class families can be included. Both the individual and the society are jointly responsible for the care of frail elderly.


返回頁首



CHAPTER 5
LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM FOR OLDER PERSONS IN GERMANY

A) BACKGROUND

  • Demographic Factor
    In 1999, the ratio of aged 65 or above is about 15.9%. It is anticipated that the aged population will be increased to 19.8% in 2010 and 23.4% in 2025. The life expectancy at birth is 80.5 for women and 74.1 for men in 2000.

  • Weakening of family care
    The dependency ratio is about 1:4 in 2000 and it will be increased to 1:2.5. The ratio between those age 80 and over to age 50 to 64 is 0.18 in 2000, and it will be increased to 0.32 by 2025. This indicates that the ability of the family to care declined. The situation would be further accelerated by the increasing involvement of women in the work force.


B) An Overview on the Development of Long Term Care System

Traditionally, the long term care service is the responsibility of local government. It was a means-tested system, in which the applicants have to go through eligibility assessment. People needing services had to pay on their own or if they cannot afford, they had to apply for welfare assistance. Due to poverty among the elderly, the local government 's budget was stained since 80% of those needing institutional care were dependent upon welfare assistance.

The long term care service was mainly provided by NGOs while the private providers were barred from the market. However, the quantity of formal care was very insufficient and it could not keep pace with the increasing demand resulting from the increasing elderly population..

The policy maker started to consider the further development of the Long Term Care System. In 1995, under the Social Dependency Insurance Act, a long term care insurance system under the administration of Care Fund was implemented for Home Care Service and for institutional care in 1996.

C) Eligibility of Using Long Term Care Service

The eligible person should require assistance in two or more ADLs for at least 6 months. The need for assistance in IADLs is considered only if a person has at least 2 ADLs requirements. The frequency and the amount of assistance will also be counted. However, the age, financial status, reason for dependency, the availability of family assistance will not be assessed. There are three levels of disability (Substantial, Severe and Very Severe).

Medical staffs of the Sick Fund (Medical Insurance) will be responsible for the assessment.


D) The Service Delivery and the Service provision

The eligible recipient can receive the long term care benefit in kind, in cash or a combination of both. The services included both community care service and institutional service. The community support service included personal care, housekeeping, assistive services, home adaptations, day care, night care and respite care. The medical board or the recipient would develop the care plan according to the level of disability.

Service Provision
Prior to the implementation of the Social Dependency Insurance Act, the service is provided by NGO and it was very insufficient. To solve the problem, the Government encouraged the involvement of private sector. Any private provider can provide who can service at reasonable price is approved to be a service provider by the Government.

E) Quality Assurance

  • Professional of care fund and sickness funds would regulate the quality of care.
  • Service providers must establish an internal system of quality assurance, which includes establishing quality circles, collecting feedback from service users and setting standards.
  • All long term care agencies are required to employ at least a registered nurse with at least 2 year's experience within the past 5 years.
  • In May 1996, care fund, central municipal association, public authority providing welfare benefits and services providers issued the binding statement of quality principles and guidelines. It included the structure, process and the outcome of care.
  • For the recipient receives cash allowance instead of service in-kind, they are obligated by law to undergo three inspection visits per year. The purpose of these visits is to ensure the quality of informal care, to provide information of available service and to give advice to informal caregivers.


F) Financing

The Long Term Care Service is financed by LTC insurance.

Insured
Under the Social Dependency Insurance Act, all citizens are legally obligated to participate in the insurance scheme(Care Fund).

Premium

  • All citizens are required to participate in the long term care insurance.

  • Persons with higher income can be exempted from the LTC insurance if they has participated in a private long term care insurance. The private insurance benefit should be comparable to those provided by the statutory long term care insurance scheme.

Both the employees and employers totally contribute 1.7% of the income as insurance premium. The employers are compensated for their premium payment through worker's concession of a holiday. For the retirees, the premium was shared equally with their pension fund. There is a limit on the maximum premium payment that would be adjusted annually.


Beneficiary
Benefit per month

Level of Disability Care at Home Care at a DayCare Centre Care in an Institution
Substantial US$ 200-- 375 US$ 375 US$ 1 000
Severe US$ 400 - 1,400 US$ 750 US $ 1 250
Very Severe US$ 650 - 1,400 US$ 1 050 US $ 1 400
Exceptional hardship Up to US$ 1 875 US $ 1 650

Source: Schneider, 1999

The amount of cash allowance is lower than the monetary value of the in-kind service. At the end of 1997, the benefit for the substantial disable person was ranged from US$200 for cash allowance to US$375 for service in kind. The recipient can use the cash allowance as personal household budget.

Co-payment
For institutional care, the recipient is required to share at least 25% of the total cost. This a strategy to encourage the recipients to use community care services


G Areas of Concern

Eligibility Criteria

The minimum disability level for eligibility is requiring daily assistance of 90 minutes per day. Therefore those who required less assistance is not receiving benefit under the system. It is argued that if there is service for the less severe, it may be able to prevent the client from further deterioration.

Besides, it is also argued that the assessment criteria are not comprehensive. It does not address the needs of cognitive impairment that required time consuming general supervision.

Coverage of the Benefit and co-payment
The benefit of the insurance was not covering the needs of the recipient. It is estimated that the benefit only covers 44% to 64% of the charges of institutional services in 1995. To cover the full needs, the older persons are required to paid by themselves or required supplementary assistance from private insurance.

返回頁首



CHAPTER 6
LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM FOR OLDER PERSONS IN NETHERLANDS

A) BACKGROUND/ OVERVIEW OF THE LONG TERM CARE SYSTEM

In1999, the population of aged 65 or over is about 13.6%. It is estimated that the proportion of elderly people will reach 15.8% by 2010 and 23% by 2025. The life expectancy at birth is 74.4 for women and 69.6 for men in 2000. The dependency ratio in relation to the working is population is 1:4.5 and it will reach 1:2.6 by 2025. The ratio of those age 80 and over per 100 persons aged 50-64 is about 18% in 2000 , and it will increase to 25 by 2025. The Netherlands is experiencing an aging population.

The Health care in the Netherlands is funded through three insurance systems:

  • Insurance for acute medical care
  • Insurance for exceptional medical expenses associated with long term care or high cost treatment in institution
  • Insurance for supplementary components of care

With the implementation of the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act in 1968, the Insurance for exceptional medical expenses is responsible for the funding of long term or high cost care in various types of institutions. This long term care insurance policy had favored the institutionalization of elderly. In 1980, the institutionalization rate was 10%.

Because of the increasing expenditures for long term care, the Dutch started to develop home care service and aimed at replacing institutional service by less expensive community services. In 1980, the home nursing services were incorporated into the insurance system and it was extended to home help services in 1989.

B Eligibility of Using Long Term Care Service

Eligibility
Residents of the Netherlands regardless of the nationality and age.

Assessment
The assessment process reviews the applicant's general health, physical
disability, psychological and social functioning, home environment, availability of formal and informal care and the possibility of continuing care.
There is no uniform tool for the assessment. The assessment of the level of assistance and the service type according to the professional judgment.

The Regional Assessment Organization that comprises of policyholder, consumer organizations, service providers, physicians, insurers and the local authority appoint a team of assessors to take the assessment. The assessors may be nurses, social workers, psycho-geriatricians and social geriatricians. For the recipient who is assessed to require institution service, a further review by a team of experts is required.


C Service Content and Service Delivery


Home care - include home nursing and home help
Mainly provided by NGO in a defined areas. Only a few for-profit agencies provide home care in large cities.

Home Nursing :
Nursing care and loan of rehab aids. The service is provided by qualified nurses with a background in public health.
The maximum service hour is 3 hour/day, but for special cases, such as terminally ill, it will be extended to a maximum of 8 hours per day.

Home help
Services included housekeeping, personal care and emotional support. The hours of care depends on the individual's needs.

"Alpha Care"
The Home help service provided by housewives that the client directly paid to a housewives rather than through a professional service agency. The maximum service hour is 16 hrs per week.

Institutional Care
Nursing Home - provide diagnosis and assessment, nursing care, rehabilitation and terminal care.
Residential Home - provide an appropriate environment for people who cannot live alone and provide assistance in ADLs, activity therapy, and medications.
Shelter Housing - provide accommodation with a supportive and adapted environment to those who can live independently.

Both the nursing home and residential home would provide services for the older person in the community, such as day care centre.


Service Delivery
The applicant would be responsible for the service arrangement after himself/herself receiving the report from the assessment team. They can freely to choose the service providers from the market. Once the service provider received the agreement to provide services, the service provider would design the care plan according to the guideline of the assessment result.


D Quality Assurance

The national government is responsible for the quality assurance. There is periodic formal inspection of the service providers by the representatives of health care system. Providers are also expected to have an internal quality control to monitor the service quality. A consumer council must be set up in every service unit.

E Financing

The long term care in the Netherlands is funded through compulsory premium, co-payment and general taxation (relative small percentage)

Insurer and Premium
The insurer is the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, which designated health insurance companies to implement the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act.

Premium
For the monthly income between USD 3 831 and USD 20 940.06, the premium is about 9.6% of the income in 1998. For the monthly income above NFL 47 000, it would be a flat payment. The employer is mainly responsible for the payment.

Children under 15 or persons aged over 15 with no taxable income are not required to pay a premium

Beneficiary
The benefit is mainly in-kind. Recipients can use various kinds of home care service and institutional service. There is no limit in the amount of service received with home care but in home nursing service, the maximum service hours is 3 hours/day.

There is a restricted program of "personal Budget" which is a restricted cash allowance provided to people eligible to receive home care service. The personal budget is calculated by multiplying the number of hours of care required by the authorized cost per hours of the service. The personal budget must be used to purchase service from formal or informal service providers. The family member may be complimented by the informal assistance.


Co payment

Service Co payment (US$)
Home Nursing USD 24.5 to USD61.04
Home Help / Alpha Care USD 4.4/hr
Low income: USD 0.98/ week
Institutional Care USD 980
Low income(Less than USD2 109/month) will be exempted

Areas of Concern
Development of Case Management
The case management approach is not yet developed in the Netherlands. After receiving the assessment result, the recipient is required to search for an appropriate service provider on their own. The older person and their carers may not have sufficient information and knowledge to search for appropriate service provider.

Objectivity of the Assessment tools
There is no uniform set of assessment tools. The assessment of the type and level of assistance depends on the professional assessment only. Therefore the standard of the assessment may vary amount different assessors.

Development of Cash Allowance
The Dutch are satisfied with the "Personal budget" as program that increases the feeling of autonomy and there is improvement in the service quality as well. In order to prevent the money from being spent on employment from the illegal market and to ensure the service quality, it is very important to set regulation on the use of cash allowance so as to protect the right of older persons.

The Dutch Government has also taken some measures, for example, the Health Insurance Fund Council would set guidelines on the use of personal budget and the Association of Personal Budget-holder has been set up to act as the intermediary between budget holders and service providers.

返回頁首


CHAPTER 7 SOME THOUGHTS FOR HONG KONG

Some experiences can be learnt from the above three countries for the future development of Long Term Care System in Hong Kong.


A) ELIGIBILITY OF LONG TERM CARE SERVICE


Eligibility Assessment tools
In these countries, significant efforts have been made to ensure standardization and objectivity in the eligibility assessment. The eligibility is based usually based on the level of disability, independent of the reason of disability. The difficulties in the performance of ADL, IADL, cognitive functioning and the need for constant supervision (especially for older person suffered from dementia) are often counted in the eligibility assessment.

In Hong Kong, a standardized care needs, assessment mechanism has been implemented since 2000. MDS-HC has been validated as the standardized assessment tools. Upon several changes, the ADL, cognitive state and continence state were taken as the only factors to determine the care level of the applicants, while the mental condition such as the mood and behavioural problem was only counted as "add on factors" only. Besides, the nursing care needs are not reflected in the assessment for service matching. Therefore the assessment is not considered as be a comprehensive and holistic one.

Calculate the Care Cost according to the level of care
From the experience of overseas countries, the disability level and the benefit are determined by the care hours required . For example, in Japan, a detail research has been conducted to calculate the resource utilization of client with different nursing care needs. There is different cost for caring of different levels of disability.

In Hong Kong, the assessment tool is mainly for the assessment of care level but the cost of caring for different level of elderly client cannot be truly reflected from the assessment

It is argued that for the benefit of the older person and ensuring the quality, the unit cost of clients in different care and nursing needs should be clearly calculated.


B) SERVICE CONTENT & SERVICE DELIVERY


Enhance the continuum of service
In order to enhance the continuum of service from acute care to long term care, it is suggested that the LTC institution in Hong Kong would provide short stay bed to provide rehabilitation service to the older persons discharged from acute hospital. It also provides assistance to the family members to take care of the discharged frail older persons. In Japan, there is short stay service in various institutions. After the period of intensive rehabilitation, the older person would return to the community.

Encourage the community support service
"Community Care" is one of the policy objectives in the spectrum of long term care service in various countries. There are often a comprehensive range of community care service covering from housekeeping to home rehabilitation service.

In Hong Kong, the Enhanced Home & Community Care Services (EHCCS) provides a comprehensive community care service including social and medical elements to the older person. However, the provision of EHCCS is currently restricted to client assessed to be of moderate impairment level. It is suggested that the eligibility of EHCCS should be based on the care/nursing need instead of the impairment level only.

Development of Case Management as a Service Delivery Model
In order to ensure a better care planning, service arrangement, coordination and service monitoring, case management is a desirable service delivery model. In Hong Kong, the concept of case management has not been widely adopted. With the increasing choice of services and the autonomy for the elderly, the concept of case management should be developed.

C) QUALITY ASSURANCE

There are a number of components of quality assurance such as training and supervision of formal and informal caregivers, licensing of service providers, establishment and regulation of quality standards found in the previous overseas countries.

In Hong Kong, all social service agencies are under the regulation of SQS and the Government is setting up an accreditation system for residential service. It is suggested that quality assurance of the community support service should also be strengthened in order to ensure an overall quality of the long term care services.

D) FINANCING -- Responsibility of care for Older Persons

The above three countries have adopted the Long Term Care Insurance as the financing model of long term care service. Taken the example from Japan's Long Term Care insurance, individual and the society are jointly responsible for the care of frail elderly.

With the increasing population of older person and the raising long term care need, it is time to consider an alternate mode of financing that can ensure the sustainability and further development of the service provision. In the long run, it is difficult for the government to bear the long term care responsibility solely.

Reference
1. Hong Kong Government(2000), Special Topics Report No27 (2000), Government of the Hong Kong SAR

2. Deloittee and Touche Consulting Group(1997) The Study of the Needs of
Elderly People in Hong Kong for Residential Care and Community Support Service, commissioned by the HK Government

3. Kane RL, Kane RA,& Ladd RC(1998), The Heart of Long Term Care New
York: Oxford Press

4. Evashwick CJ (2001), The Continuum of Long-Term Care, US: Delmar Thomson Learning

5. World Health Organization 2000, Long Term Care Laws in Five Developed Countries - A Review, WHO

Web-site
1. Hong Kong Census and Statistic Homepage (October, 2001)
2. http://www.caremanager.net/

Remarks: The Information on the LTC system is mainly summarized from the Long Term Care Laws in Five Developed Countries - A Review, WHO and the information gained from the Study Visit on Long Term Care System for Older person in Japan in July, 2002.

返回頁首

 





















 

社聯主頁 | 聯絡我們 | 繁體版面 | 簡體版面 | English | 廣東話語音版 | 普通話語音版 | Voice Eng
2002© 香港社會服務聯會 版權所有